Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
82
Highlights
59
Differences
9
Reactions
0
Likes
Shure VP83F
vs
Rode VideoMic Pro+:
82 Highlights & 59 Differences —
So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
Explore differences in sound quality, battery life, and connectivity to find your perfect audio companion.
Which one’s right for your setup — Shure VP83F or Rode VideoMic Pro+? We’ve compared their connection interface, stand/tripod, warranty & model name, usability, and sound so you can choose the better microphone.
Shure VP83F vs Rode VideoMic Pro+: A Detailed Comparison of Two Leading Shotgun Microphones
Both the Shure VP83F and Rode VideoMic Pro+ are high-quality condenser shotgun microphones designed to elevate audio capture for video recording professionals. While they share the core purpose of delivering superior directional sound with supercardioid or unidirectional polar patterns, their distinct approaches reveal interesting contrasts.
The Shure VP83F, released in 2013, centers on straightforward field recording with integrated recording features and wired connectivity, favoring simplicity and on-the-go use. In contrast, the Rode VideoMic Pro+, launched in 2017, modernizes with multi-platform compatibility including USB, longer battery life via Li-ion, and an array of advanced audio processing capabilities tailored for studio, podcast, and broadcast environments.
Both microphones boast metal construction, built-in shock mounts, and windscreens, ensuring durability and wind noise reduction during shoots. However, the Rode's wider low-end frequency response from 20 Hz compared to the Shure's 50 Hz enables richer bass capture. Additionally, Rode supports USB connectivity and features such as AI noise cancellation and multi-pattern switching, broadening its versatility beyond typical shotgun microphone use.
Shure VP83F: Compact Field Recording with Integrated Controls
The Shure VP83F stands out for its integration of analog simplicity with some digital conveniences. Its compact yet slightly longer body (6.61 inches depth) and a weight of 0.47 lbs grant a solid handheld feel without being cumbersome. The smaller mounting thread size of 1/4 inch ensures compatibility with many camera shoe mounts.
In the audio department, the VP83F delivers a respectable 76 dB signal-to-noise ratio and dynamic range of 111.6 dB, making it capable in standard field conditions. Notably, it includes a voice isolation feature to help focus on speech in noisy environments. The microphone uses AA batteries, providing around 10 hours of operation, making it convenient for extended shoots without access to charging.
One of its exceptional perks is the built-in one-touch recording button and real-time headphone monitoring, allowing users to directly capture and monitor audio without a secondary device. This tight integration of controls and audio feedback on the microphone itself benefits solo content creators and field videographers who require reliability and simplicity.
Rode VideoMic Pro+: Advanced Features and Sophisticated Connectivity
The Rode VideoMic Pro+ caters to professionals demanding versatility and high-fidelity sound. With a more compact and lightweight form (4.4 inches depth, 0.27 lbs), it fits unobtrusively atop cameras and rigs while offering a shock mount with detachable components for tailored setups.
Its audio capabilities are impressive, boasting a wider 20 Hz to 20 kHz frequency response compared to Shure's 50 Hz floor, coupled with a higher sensitivity of -33.6 dBV, and a better 78 dB signal-to-noise ratio. This ensures crisp, detailed audio capture suitable for studio and live environments. The onboard transformerless preamp enhances sound clarity while allowing the mic to handle louder sources up to 133 dB SPL.
The Rode's connectivity options include both TRS and USB, with balanced output and dual output capabilities, making it seamless for digital workflows and live broadcasting. The microphone supports phantom power and an external power supply, unlike the Shure VP83F, which solely runs on battery power.
Its rechargeable Li-ion battery delivers a remarkable 100 hours of battery life and charges rapidly via USB-C in about 3 hours, with smart automatic power-off features that maximize efficiency. Rode also integrates advanced DSP processing featuring feedback suppression, automatic gain adjustment, and AI noise cancellation, enhancing audio quality in challenging environments.
While lacking headphone monitoring, the VideoMic Pro+ compensates with mute functions, monitoring mix controls, and app/software compatibility, including smart assistant integration and firmware upgrades, catering to digitally savvy professionals. Its durable design with corrosion resistance, pop filter, and shock mount stands up to rigorous field and studio use. The package comes loaded with valuable accessories such as a tripod stand, extra windscreen, carrying case, and long warranty coverage, ensuring reliable long-term service.
Quick Take
The Shure VP83F excels as a streamlined, user-friendly option for videographers who want direct recording on the microphone and real-time headphone monitoring without juggling extra devices. Conversely, the Rode VideoMic Pro+ impresses with its advanced technical finesse, extensive connectivity solutions, and stellar battery performance, making it a versatile powerhouse for demanding studio and broadcast scenarios.
Bottom Line Recommendation
If you prioritize an integrated, rugged field-ready microphone with simple controls, the Shure VP83F is an excellent companion for straightforward, high-quality analog audio capture. However, if your workflow demands sophisticated sound quality, extended battery life, USB connectivity, and cutting-edge DSP features suitable for studio and multi-situational use, the Rode VideoMic Pro+ emerges as the premium choice.
Verdict
Winner: Rode VideoMic Pro+ - For its superior audio fidelity, versatile connectivity options, rechargeable, long-lasting battery, and feature-rich DSP enhancements.
Runner-up: Shure VP83F - Ideal for professionals who need simplicity, onboard recording, and integrated headphone monitoring in a sturdy package.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
We stacked every sound, control, and tech detail between Shure VP83F and Rode VideoMic Pro+. This side-by-side microphones review highlights what really matters — and what might surprise you.
Released in 2017, the VideoMic Pro+ quickly became a favorite among filmmakers and vloggers. Its popularity is attributed to its superb sound quality and extensive feature set.
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Year of Release,
Shure VP83F ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The Rode VideoMic Pro+ being released in 2017 makes it a newer model than the 2013 Shure. This usually means better tech and features. I generally prefer newer devices.
The Model Name differs between the two products, with the Shure VP83F named 'VP83F' and the Rode VideoMic Pro+ named 'VideoMic Pro+'. This distinguishes their specific branding and model lines.
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
The VideoMic Pro+ is compatible with most cameras, making it a versatile option for vloggers and filmmakers. Its simple setup allows for easy mounting and use with DSLR and mirrorless cameras.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
68
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Condenser
57
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Condenser
vs
Product Type
The Product Type for both the Shure VP83F and the Rode VideoMic Pro+ is Condenser, indicating they share the same fundamental microphone technology.
Defines the basic category of the microphone.
In the battle of Product Type,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Form Factor
What is the form factor?
58
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Shotgun
67
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Shotgun
Shure VP83F
Featuring a Shotgun form factor, this microphone is highly directional, designed to capture sound from a specific area while rejecting off-axis noise, ideal for dialogue and target audio.
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Shotgun microphones are highly directional, focusing on sounds from the front while rejecting noise from the sides and rear. This design makes it perfect for capturing clear audio in dynamic environments.
Describes the physical style of the microphone.
In the battle of Form Factor,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Form Factor on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What are the color options?
78
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Black
37
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Black
Shure VP83F
The microphone is available in a Black finish, which is a common and professional color choice for audio equipment.
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The matte black color ensures the microphone looks sleek and professional on any setup. Its neutral color fits seamlessly with most cameras and equipment.
Available product colors.
In the battle of Color Options,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Type
What is the mounting type?
53
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Shoe Mount
62
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Shock Mount
Shure VP83F
Designed with a Shoe Mount, the microphone can be easily attached directly to the hot shoe or cold shoe of most DSLR cameras, camcorders, or portable audio recorders for on-camera use.
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The shock mount isolates the microphone from vibrations and handling noise, which is crucial for clear audio capture. It’s designed to absorb bumps and movements, ensuring a stable recording.
The typical mounting or support style.
In the battle of Mounting Type,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Type on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
This microphone is primarily designed for Field Recording, making it suitable for capturing audio in outdoor environments, documentaries, run-and-gun filmmaking, and news gathering.
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Whether you’re recording in a studio or broadcasting live, the VideoMic Pro+ delivers professional-grade audio. Its versatility makes it suitable for podcasts, interviews, and field recordings.
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Application Category on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
What is the country of origin?
73
Shure VP83F
0Votes
China
52
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Australia
vs
Country of Origin
The Shure VP83F is from China, whereas the Rode VideoMic Pro+ originates from Australia. This indicates different manufacturing origins for the two microphones.
Manufacturing or design origin.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
21 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
The Intended Use for the Shure VP83F is 'Video Recording,' while the Rode VideoMic Pro+ is designed for a broader range including 'Studio,Live,Podcast,Broadcast,Instrument,Streaming'. The Rode offers greater versatility across various applications.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Type
What is the polar pattern type?
83
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Supercardioid
72
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Supercardioid
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The supercardioid pattern offers focused audio capture from the front while significantly reducing noise from the sides. It’s ideal for interviews and shooting in noisy environments.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Type on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Connectivity Type
What is the connectivity type?
18
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Wired
65
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
USB, TRS
vs
Connectivity Type
The Shure VP83F uses 'Wired' Connectivity Type, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ offers 'USB,TRS' connections. The Rode provides more flexible connectivity options with both traditional TRS and modern USB.
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connectivity Type on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Target
What is the gender target?
98
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Unisex
47
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Unisex
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The VideoMic Pro+ is designed to be universally usable, with intuitive controls that cater to all users. Its compact size and easy-to-use features make it suitable for everyone.
The marketing target by gender (if specified).
In the battle of Gender Target,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
51 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gender Target on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Age Group
What is the age group?
78
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Professional
82
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Adult, Professional
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Tailored for adults and professionals, the VideoMic Pro+ is perfect for content creators and audio experts. Its advanced features make it ideal for those with technical expertise in audio recording.
The intended user age bracket.
In the battle of Age Group,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Age Group on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
User Skill Level
What is the user skill level?
98
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Professional
97
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Professional
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The VideoMic Pro+ is designed for users with professional-level expertise, offering advanced features like gain control and high-pass filtering. It’s ideal for experienced content creators and audio engineers.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Skill Level on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Launch Region
Where is it available?
98
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Global
97
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Global
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The VideoMic Pro+ is available globally, making it accessible to content creators and professionals in various regions. It’s widely used by filmmakers, journalists, and vloggers worldwide.
Where the product is primarily available.
In the battle of Launch Region,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Launch Region on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Limited Edition
Is it a limited/special edition?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
This microphone is not a limited edition; it is available year-round with full support and warranty. Rode ensures that it remains in production and easy to find for professionals.
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
In the battle of Limited Edition,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Limited Edition on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Series/Line
What series/line does it belong to?
52
Shure VP83F
0Votes
LensHopper
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Series/Line on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
The Shure VP83F features a Mounting Thread Size of 1/4 inch, while the Rode VideoMic Pro+ uses a 3/8 inch thread. The Rode has a larger, and often more robust, mounting thread standard.
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
In the battle of Mounting Thread Size,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Mounting Thread Size,
Shure VP83F ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The 3/8 inch mounting thread size on the Rode is more standard for pro audio equipment. Shure's 1/4 inch is okay, but I prefer the wider compatibility of 3/8 for my setups. It just feels sturdier.
See more
Height
What is the height?
3.82
inch
0Votes
6.7
inch
0Votes
vs
Height
The Shure VP83F has a Height of 3.82 inches (9.7 cm), while the Rode VideoMic Pro+ is taller at 6.7 inches (17.02 cm). The Rode stands 2.88 inches (7.32 cm) higher than the Shure.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
2.9 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Weight
What is the weight?
0.47
lbs
0Votes
0.27
lbs
1Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Weighing just 0.27 lbs (122 g), the VideoMic Pro+ is lightweight and won’t add unnecessary bulk to your camera rig. It’s easy to carry around for on-the-go recordings.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
0.2 lbs
measurement.
Based on community votes for Weight,
Shure VP83F ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Rode is significantly lighter at 0.27 lbs, which is a huge plus for camera setups. Shure is almost twice as heavy. Lighter gear is always better.
See more
Width
What is the width?
2.28
inch
0Votes
2.6
inch
0Votes
vs
Width
The Shure VP83F has a Width of 2.28 inches (5.79 cm), and the Rode VideoMic Pro+ is 2.6 inches (6.6 cm) wide. The Rode is slightly wider by 0.32 inches (0.81 cm).
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
0.3 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth?
6.61
inch
0Votes
4.4
inch
0Votes
vs
Depth
The Depth of the Shure VP83F is 6.61 inches (16.79 cm), which is deeper than the Rode VideoMic Pro+'s 4.4 inches (11.18 cm). The Shure is significantly deeper by 2.21 inches (5.61 cm).
The microphone’s overall depth.
In the battle of Depth,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
2.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
4.88
inch
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The package width is 4.88 inches (12.4 cm), providing a compact box that’s easy to store and carry. The size ensures the microphone remains protected during transport.
The shipping package’s width.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
2.36
inch
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
With a package depth of 2.36 inches (6 cm), the microphone’s box is slim and easy to store. It’s designed to fit neatly in most storage spaces without taking up much room.
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
8.27
inch
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The height of the package is 8.27 inches (21 cm), making it convenient for retail display or for storing in your gear bag.
The shipping package’s height.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3.3
ft
0Votes
vs
Cable Length
Cable Length is unavailable for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ includes a 3.3 ft (1 meter) cable. The Rode provides a specified cable length, which is helpful for setup planning.
Length of the included or integrated cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Arm Length on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Diameter
What is the capsule diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Diameter on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Length
What is the capsule length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Length on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Diameter
What is the grill diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Diameter on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Base Footprint Diameter on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
The high signal-to-noise ratio ensures minimal interference, delivering cleaner recordings with less background noise.
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
In the battle of Signal-to-Noise Ratio,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
2.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
87
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Studio-Grade
vs
Internal Preamp Quality
The Internal Preamp Quality is not specified for the Shure VP83F, while the Rode VideoMic Pro+ boasts a 'Studio-Grade' preamp. The Rode implies higher fidelity and professional audio processing capabilities.
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Preamp Quality on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Max SPL
What is the maximum SPL?
129
dB
0Votes
133
dB
1Votes
vs
Max SPL
The Shure VP83F has a Max SPL of 129 dB, while the Rode VideoMic Pro+ can handle up to 133 dB. The Rode can tolerate 4 dB louder sound pressure levels before distortion, making it suitable for louder sources.
The maximum loudness before distortion.
In the battle of Max SPL,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
4.0 dB
measurement.
Based on community votes for Max SPL,
Shure VP83F ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉,
which got 1 votes.
A max SPL of 133 dB on the Rode is fantastic for loud environments or instruments. Shure's 129 dB is decent, but Rode handles louder sources better without clipping. That extra headroom is key.
See more
Capsule Type
What is the capsule type?
87
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Electret
67
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Large Diaphragm
Shure VP83F
The microphone uses an Electret condenser capsule, known for its small size, low power consumption, and suitability for compact, battery-powered devices.
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The large diaphragm design ensures a fuller, richer sound, capturing both subtle details and loud sounds with excellent fidelity. It’s perfect for voice, instruments, and environmental sounds.
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
In the battle of Capsule Type,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
20 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Type on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Max)
What is the maximum frequency response?
20,000
Hz
0Votes
20,000
Hz
0Votes
vs
Frequency Response (Max)
Both the Shure VP83F and the Rode VideoMic Pro+ share the same maximum Frequency Response (Max) of 20000 Hz. They are equally capable of capturing high-frequency sounds up to this limit.
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max),
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
equal
20,000.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Max) on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Equivalent Noise Level
What is the equivalent noise level?
18
dB
0Votes
14
dB
0Votes
Shure VP83F
The microphone has an equivalent noise level of 18 dB, indicating its inherent self-noise. A lower value signifies a cleaner signal, especially important for capturing subtle sounds.
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The low noise level (14 dBA) ensures that even the quietest sounds are captured clearly without noticeable hiss or distortion.
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
In the battle of Equivalent Noise Level,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
4.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equivalent Noise Level on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Cut Filter
What is the low-cut filter cutoff?
170
Hz
0Votes
150
Hz
0Votes
vs
Low-Cut Filter
The Low-Cut Filter for the Shure VP83F is at 170 Hz, compared to the Rode VideoMic Pro+'s 150 Hz. The Rode's low-cut filter engages at a slightly lower frequency, allowing more low-end presence before filtering out rumble.
Removes low-end rumble.
In the battle of Low-Cut Filter,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
20.0 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Cut Filter on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Isolation Feature
Does it have voice isolation?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
Voice Isolation Feature
The Shure VP83F includes a Voice Isolation Feature, which is not present in the Rode VideoMic Pro+. This feature could be beneficial for reducing background noise specifically around vocal recordings with the Shure.
Whether the mic includes isolation tech.
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
46 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Isolation Feature on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Min)
What is the minimum frequency response?
50
Hz
0Votes
20
Hz
1Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The microphone captures frequencies as low as 20 Hz, ensuring it picks up deep bass and low-end sounds.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min),
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
30.0 Hz
measurement.
Based on community votes for Frequency Response (Min),
Shure VP83F ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The Rode's 20 Hz low-end frequency response sounds way better. Shure's 50 Hz might miss some of those deeper tones. I'd definitely go with Rode for richer audio.
See more
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
78
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Condenser
67
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Condenser
Rode VideoMic Pro+
As a condenser microphone, the VideoMic Pro+ captures clear, detailed sound with sensitivity to even the softest noises. It’s ideal for professional recordings in controlled or dynamic environments.
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Microphone Type on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity
What is the sensitivity?
-36.5
dBV/Pa
0Votes
-33.6
dBV/Pa
0Votes
vs
Sensitivity
The Shure VP83F has a Sensitivity of -36.5 dBV/Pa, compared to the Rode VideoMic Pro+'s -33.6 dBV/Pa. The Rode is more sensitive by 2.9 dBV/Pa, meaning it requires less gain to achieve a strong signal.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
In the battle of Sensitivity,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
2.9 dBV/Pa
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Directionality
What is the directionality?
73
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Supercardioid
17
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Unidirectional
Rode VideoMic Pro+
As a unidirectional microphone, it focuses on capturing sound from the front while rejecting noise from the sides and rear. This is especially useful for isolating the sound source.
General pickup orientation.
In the battle of Directionality,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
56 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directionality on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Output Impedance
What is the output impedance?
171
ohm
0Votes
200
ohm
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The 200-ohm output impedance ensures optimal signal transfer and compatibility with various audio devices.
Electrical resistance of the microphone’s output.
In the battle of Output Impedance,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
29.0 ohm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Impedance on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Range
What is the gain range?
60
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Gain Range
The Shure VP83F offers a Gain Range of 60 dB, but this specification is unavailable for the Rode VideoMic Pro+. The Shure provides control over a wide range of input levels for various recording scenarios.
The adjustable gain span.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Range on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
18
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Mono
27
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Mono
Rode VideoMic Pro+
It outputs audio in mono, ideal for capturing focused sound from one source, like an individual speaker or instrument.
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stereo/Mono Mode on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
67
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Medium
vs
Transient Response
Transient Response is not specified for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ lists it as 'Medium.' The Rode provides an indication of how accurately it captures sudden changes in sound.
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transient Response on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Proximity Effect Control
Does it have proximity effect control?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
It does not include proximity effect control, but its design minimizes unwanted noise and captures clear, focused sound.
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proximity Effect Control on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Transformer/Transformerless Design
What design does it use?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
97
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Transformerless
vs
Transformer/Transformerless Design
Information on Transformer/Transformerless Design is unavailable for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ is 'Transformerless.' A transformerless design in the Rode typically offers a cleaner signal path and extended frequency response.
The electrical coupling approach used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transformer/Transformerless Design on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Dynamic Range
What is the dynamic range?
111.6
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dynamic Range on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Terminating Impedance
What is the minimum terminating impedance?
1,000
Ω
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Minimum Terminating Impedance
The Minimum Terminating Impedance for the Shure VP83F is 1000 Ω, while this value is not available for the Rode VideoMic Pro+. The Shure provides a clear guideline for optimal impedance matching with connected devices.
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Terminating Impedance on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
THD
What is the THD (total Harmonic Distortion)?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
THD on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-Attenuation Pad
What is the pre-attenuation pad?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-Attenuation Pad on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Principle
What is the acoustic principle?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Principle on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Headroom
What is the headroom?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Range above nominal operating level before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headroom on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Off-Axis Rejection
What is the off-axis rejection?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Off-Axis Rejection on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Overload Point
What is the overload point?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The SPL level where overload occurs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overload Point on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating
What is the acoustic noise isolation rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
What is the switching precision?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Switching Precision on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Output Level
What is the output level?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Level on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
The Shure VP83F uses a 'TRS' Connection Interface, while the Rode VideoMic Pro+ offers both 'USB,TRS' options. The Rode provides more versatile connection choices for different recording setups.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
34 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Connection Interface,
Shure VP83F ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Rode having both USB and TRS connection interfaces is a massive advantage for versatility. Shure is limited to just TRS, which is kinda old-school now. Modern setups need USB.
The Shure VP83F features an 'Unbalanced' output, in contrast to the Rode VideoMic Pro+'s 'Balanced' output. The Rode's balanced output is generally superior for rejecting noise over longer cable runs.
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
97 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Balanced/Unbalanced Output on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Shielding Against RF Interference
Is there RF shielding?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Shure VP83F
The microphone features shielding against RF interference, which helps to prevent unwanted noise from radio frequencies, cell phones, and other electronic devices from entering the audio signal. This ensures clean recordings in various environments.
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The microphone is shielded against RF interference, ensuring clear audio without unwanted signal noise.
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shielding Against RF Interference on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Detachable
Is the cable detachable?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The detachable cable offers ease of replacement and flexibility for different setups.
Whether the cable can be detached or replaced.
In the battle of Cable Detachable,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Detachable on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
USB Compatibility
What USB versions are compatible?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
24
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Micro-USB
vs
USB Compatibility
USB Compatibility is unavailable for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ specifies 'Micro-USB.' The Rode offers direct digital connectivity via Micro-USB, expanding its compatibility with computers and other devices.
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Compatibility on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Support
Does it support phantom power?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
Phantom Power Support
Phantom Power Support is not available for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ does support it. The Rode can be powered directly from compatible cameras or audio interfaces, offering a potential power source flexibility.
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
In the battle of Phantom Power Support,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Support on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Output Capability
Does it have dual output capability?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
Dual Output Capability
Dual Output Capability is unavailable for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ offers this feature. The Rode can output audio to multiple destinations simultaneously, enhancing its utility in complex setups.
Ability to provide two simultaneous outputs.
In the battle of Dual Output Capability,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Output Capability on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration
What is the XLR pin configuration?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
97
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Standard
vs
XLR Pin Configuration
XLR Pin Configuration is not specified for the Shure VP83F, while the Rode VideoMic Pro+ uses a 'Standard' configuration. The Rode provides clear information for XLR cable compatibility.
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
XLR Pin Configuration on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Technology
What wireless technology is used?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Technology on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth Version
What Bluetooth version does it support?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Version of Bluetooth supported (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth Version on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
RF Frequency Range
What is the RF frequency range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RF Frequency Range on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Output Options
What are the audio output options?
0
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Analog
17
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Analog
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Output Options on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interface Latency on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Device Pairing on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Ground Lift Switch
Does it have a ground lift switch?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Prevents ground loop hum in audio systems.
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ground Lift Switch on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
The Shure VP83F uses 'AA' Battery Type, while the Rode VideoMic Pro+ utilizes a 'Li-ion' battery. The Rode's Li-ion battery is typically rechargeable and offers higher energy density.
The type of battery used if portable.
In the battle of Battery Type,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
85 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Type on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
The Shure VP83F offers a Battery Life of 10 hours, significantly less than the Rode VideoMic Pro+'s 100 hours. The Rode provides ten times longer battery life, ideal for extended recording sessions.
How long the microphone operates per charge.
In the battle of Battery Life,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
90.0 hrs
measurement.
Based on community votes for Battery Life,
Shure VP83F ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
94
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
USB-C
vs
Charging Method
Charging Method is not available for the Shure VP83F, while the Rode VideoMic Pro+ specifies 'USB-C' charging. The Rode offers modern, reversible USB-C charging for convenience.
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Method on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Requirement on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
0
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Battery
62
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Battery, USB
Shure VP83F
The microphone is powered by Battery, providing portability and independence from external power sources, which is essential for mobile recording setups.
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The microphone is powered by either a rechargeable battery, USB, or AA batteries for flexible use in various environments.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
62 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Battery Support
Does it support replaceable batteries?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Shure VP83F
The microphone supports replaceable batteries, allowing users to easily swap out depleted batteries for fresh ones. This ensures continuous operation during extended recording sessions without waiting for recharge.
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The VideoMic Pro+ allows users to replace the battery, offering flexibility for extended usage.
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
In the battle of Replaceable Battery Support,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Battery Support on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1,600
mAh
0Votes
vs
Battery Capacity
Battery Capacity is not available for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ has a capacity of 1600 mAh. The Rode provides clear battery capacity information for power management.
Storage capacity of the built-in battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
External Power Supply Compatibility
Is it compatible with an external power supply?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Can be powered by an external power supply when needed, providing added convenience for extended recording sessions.
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
External Power Supply Compatibility on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Power Indicator Light
Does it have a power indicator light?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The power indicator light keeps you informed about battery status, preventing unexpected power loss.
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
In the battle of Power Indicator Light,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Indicator Light on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3
hrs
0Votes
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recharge Time on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-Off
Does it have auto power-off?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
In the battle of Auto Power-Off,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-Off on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
The Shure VP83F features Headphone Monitoring, which is not present in the Rode VideoMic Pro+. The Shure allows direct audio monitoring through headphones, helpful for ensuring sound quality during recording.
Direct monitoring via headphone output.
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
46 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Headphone Monitoring,
Shure VP83F ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Headphone monitoring directly on the mic is super important for field work, so Shure wins this one. Not having it on the Rode is a dealbreaker for me. Gotta hear what I'm recording.
Automatic Gain Adjustment is not specified for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ offers it. The Rode can automatically adjust its gain to maintain consistent audio levels, simplifying recording for users.
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Gain Adjustment on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression is not available for the Shure VP83F, whereas the Rode VideoMic Pro+ includes this feature. The Rode can actively reduce unwanted audio feedback, which is beneficial in live or amplified environments.
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Onboard Controls
What onboard controls are available?
0
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Buttons, Switches
63
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Buttons, Knobs
Shure VP83F
The microphone is equipped with Buttons and Switches for direct control over settings such as gain, low-cut filter, and recording functions, providing convenient adjustments without external devices.
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Offers intuitive control over gain, mute, and other settings via onboard buttons and knobs.
Types of direct physical controls.
In the battle of Onboard Controls,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
63 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Onboard Controls on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Control
Does it have gain control?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Shure VP83F
The microphone features a gain control, allowing users to adjust the input sensitivity to match various recording environments and audio sources. This prevents signal clipping or ensures adequate volume.
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Gain control lets you adjust the input sensitivity to suit different recording environments.
Ability to adjust input gain directly.
In the battle of Gain Control,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Control on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Monitoring Mix Control
Does it have monitoring mix control?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
Monitoring Mix Control
Monitoring Mix Control is unavailable for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ includes this feature. The Rode offers the ability to blend input audio with monitoring audio, providing more control over the listening experience.
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monitoring Mix Control on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Touch/Motion Controls
Does it support touch/motion controls?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Does not feature touch or motion controls, but the buttons and knobs provide precise manual adjustments.
Allows interaction via touch gestures or motion.
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch/Motion Controls on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
LED Indicator Lights
Does it have LED indicators?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
LED lights show the status of the microphone’s power, gain, and other settings for easy visibility.
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator Lights on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Mode Switch
Does the microphone have a multi-mode switch?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Does not support multi-mode functionality, focusing on a single mode of operation for simplicity.
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Mode Switch on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Lock Mode
Does it have a lock mode?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Does not feature a lock mode, though controls are simple enough for easy operation without risk of accidental changes.
Prevents accidental control changes.
In the battle of Lock Mode,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lock Mode on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
App/Software Integration
Is it integrated with software/apps?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App/Software Integration on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Effects on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
One-touch Recording Button
The Shure VP83F features a One-touch Recording Button, which is not present on the Rode VideoMic Pro+. The Shure offers quick and easy recording initiation directly from the microphone.
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
better than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
higher
46 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-touch Recording Button on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Button Functions on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity Preset Profiles
Does it have sensitivity presets?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity Preset Profiles on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Corrosion Resistance is not available for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ is corrosion resistant. The Rode offers enhanced durability against environmental factors.
Indicates if materials resist corrosion.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Corrosion Resistance on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Windscreen
Is a windscreen included?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Shure VP83F
A windscreen is included with the microphone, which helps to reduce wind noise and plosives during outdoor recording or close-up vocal capture. This improves audio clarity in challenging environments.
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The windscreen helps reduce wind noise during outdoor shoots, ensuring a cleaner recording.
Whether a windscreen is included for wind noise control.
In the battle of Windscreen,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Windscreen on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Body Material
What is the body material?
0
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Metal
57
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Metal
vs
Body Material
Both the Shure VP83F and the Rode VideoMic Pro+ are constructed with 'Metal' Body Material. This indicates a durable and robust build for both microphones.
The main structural material of the microphone body.
In the battle of Body Material,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
57 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Body Material on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Finish/Coating
What finish/coating does it have?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
77
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Matte
vs
Finish/Coating
The Finish/Coating is not specified for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ features a 'Matte' finish. The Rode offers a non-glossy appearance, which can be less reflective on camera.
Exterior treatment or surface finish.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish/Coating on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Pop Filter
Is a pop filter included?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Helps to reduce popping sounds from plosives (like P's and B's), ensuring clearer vocal recordings.
Whether a pop filter is provided for plosive reduction.
In the battle of Pop Filter,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pop Filter on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Water Resistance
Is it water resistant?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Not water-resistant, so it’s important to avoid exposing the microphone to moisture.
Indicates if the mic is resistant to water.
In the battle of Water Resistance,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Water Resistance on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance
Is it drop resistant?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Designed to withstand minor drops, adding durability in case of accidental knocks.
Indicates if the mic is designed to survive accidental drops.
In the battle of Drop Resistance,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Adjustable Arm/Stand
Does it have an adjustable arm/stand?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Does not include an adjustable arm or stand, so it must be mounted directly to the camera or other equipment.
Whether the arm/stand can be adjusted.
In the battle of Adjustable Arm/Stand,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adjustable Arm/Stand on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Mount
Is the mount detachable?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
Detachable Mount
A Detachable Mount is not specified for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ includes this feature. The Rode allows for easier attachment and removal of its mount, enhancing portability and versatility.
If the mount can be detached for flexibility.
In the battle of Detachable Mount,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Mount on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Swivel/Pivot Capability
Does it have swivel/pivot capability?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Shure VP83F
The microphone offers swivel/pivot capability, allowing for flexible positioning and precise aiming towards the sound source. This enhances versatility in various recording setups.
Whether the microphone head or stand can rotate.
In the battle of Swivel/Pivot Capability,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Swivel/Pivot Capability on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Material
What is the grill material?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
47
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Metal
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Durable metal grill protects the microphone’s internal components, ensuring longevity.
The material of the protective mic grill.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Material on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Dampening Material
What is the internal dampening material?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
67
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Foam
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Foam inside the microphone helps dampen vibrations and improve sound quality.
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Dampening Material on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Dust Resistance
Is it dust resistant?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Indicates if the mic is resistant to dust.
In the battle of Dust Resistance,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dust Resistance on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Design
Is it foldable?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Indicates if the mic or its stand can fold for portability.
In the battle of Foldable Design,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Design on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance Rating
What is the heat resistance rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance Rating on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Neodymium Magnet
Does it use a neodymium magnet?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
Neodymium Magnet
Neodymium Magnet information is unavailable for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ includes a 'Yes' for this feature. Neodymium magnets in the Rode typically contribute to a more powerful and efficient transducer.
States whether the capsule uses a neodymium magnet for stability.
In the battle of Neodymium Magnet,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Neodymium Magnet on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Shockmount
Is there an internal shockmount for the capsule?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Capsule isolation that reduces handling noise.
In the battle of Internal Shockmount,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Shockmount on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Whether a manual or quick-start guide is included.
In the battle of Instruction Manual,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Instruction Manual on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Card
Is a warranty card included?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Shure VP83F
A warranty card is included with the product, providing details on the coverage and terms of the manufacturer's warranty. This ensures customers can register their product and receive support if needed.
Whether a warranty card is included.
In the battle of Warranty Card,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Card on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Adapters
Are adapters included?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
Adapters
Adapters are not specified for the Shure VP83F, whereas the Rode VideoMic Pro+ includes them. The Rode provides necessary adapters for broader compatibility with various devices.
States if adapter(s) are included (e.g., XLR to 3.5mm).
In the battle of Adapters,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapters on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Clip
Is a mounting clip included?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Whether a clip for attaching to stands/instruments is included.
In the battle of Mounting Clip,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Clip on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Extra Windscreen
Is an extra windscreen included?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
Extra Windscreen
An Extra Windscreen is not specified for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ includes one. The Rode offers a spare windscreen, useful for maintenance or replacement.
Indicates if a spare windscreen is included.
In the battle of Extra Windscreen,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Extra Windscreen on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging Type
What is the packaging type?
0
Shure VP83F
0Votes
Box
27
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Box
Defines how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
27 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Packaging Type on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Spare Parts Availability
Are spare parts available?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Whether the manufacturer provides replacement parts.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Spare Parts Availability on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Stickers/Branding
Are stickers/branding included?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Indicates if stickers or branded items are in the package.
In the battle of Stickers/Branding,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stickers/Branding on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Foam Insert
Is protective foam included?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Indicates if protective foam is part of packaging.
In the battle of Protective Foam Insert,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Foam Insert on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Optional Windshield Model
What is the recommended windshield model?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Manufacturer-recommended windshield model.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Optional Windshield Model on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
The Shure VP83F comes with a 2-year Warranty, while the Rode VideoMic Pro+ offers a substantial 10-year warranty. The Rode provides significantly longer peace of mind regarding product defects.
Duration of manufacturer warranty coverage.
In the battle of Warranty,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
8.0 years
measurement.
Based on community votes for Warranty,
Shure VP83F ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉,
which got 1 votes.
10 years of warranty for the Rode is absolutely incredible; it shows they stand by their product. Shure's 2-year warranty is pretty standard, but Rode blows it out of the water. Long-term reliability is important.
In the battle of Environmental Compliance,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Compliance on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Professional Broadcast Certification is not available for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ possesses this certification. The Rode is officially recognized for meeting broadcast quality standards.
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Professional Broadcast Certification on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
FCC/CE Approval
Is it FCC/CE approved?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Shure VP83F
The microphone has received FCC/CE approval, confirming its compliance with the electromagnetic compatibility and safety standards required for sale in specified regions.
Explicit FCC/CE compliance approval.
In the battle of FCC/CE Approval,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
FCC/CE Approval on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
RoHS Compliance
Is it RoHS compliant?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Shure VP83F
The product is RoHS compliant, meaning it adheres to the Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive and is free from certain dangerous materials. This indicates a commitment to environmental safety.
Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive compliance.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RoHS Compliance on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Range (Operating)
What is the operating temperature range?
0
Shure VP83F
0Votes
0° to 120°F
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Temperature Range (Operating)
The Temperature Range (Operating) for the Shure VP83F is 0° to 120°F (approx. -18°C to 49°C), while this information is unavailable for the Rode VideoMic Pro+. The Shure provides specific environmental operating limits.
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Range (Operating) on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Compliance
Is it safety compliant?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Indicates adherence to safety regulations.
In the battle of Safety Compliance,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Compliance on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Beamforming Technology,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Beamforming Technology on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Low Latency Monitoring
Does it support low-latency monitoring?
Yes
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Shure VP83F
The microphone supports low latency monitoring, allowing users to hear their audio input with minimal delay. This is crucial for real-time adjustments and accurate recording.
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
, delivering
lower
86 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Latency Monitoring on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Hum-Compensating Coil
Does it have a hum-compensating coil?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Rode VideoMic Pro+
The microphone does not have a hum-compensating coil, but its built-in shielding reduces electrical interference.
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
In the battle of Hum-Compensating Coil,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hum-Compensating Coil on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Pattern Switching
Does it support multi-pattern switching?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
Multi-Pattern Switching
Multi-Pattern Switching is not available for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ includes this feature. The Rode allows users to change polar patterns, offering greater flexibility in sound pickup.
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Pattern Switching on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
AI Noise Cancellation
Does it feature AI noise cancellation?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
AI-powered suppression of background noise.
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Noise Cancellation on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Tracking
Does it include voice tracking?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Automatically follows speaker’s voice.
In the battle of Voice Tracking,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Tracking on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Profiles
Does it have recording profiles?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Predefined sound settings for specific uses.
In the battle of Recording Profiles,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Profiles on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Surround Capture Mode
Does it support surround capture?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Ability to capture immersive 360° or surround sound.
In the battle of Surround Capture Mode,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surround Capture Mode on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Calibration
Does it support auto calibration?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
No
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
same as
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Calibration on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Is it compatible with smart assistants?
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure VP83F
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
85
Rode VideoMic Pro+
0Votes
Alexa, Google Assistant
vs
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Smart Assistant Compatibility is not specified for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ is compatible with 'Alexa,Google Assistant.' The Rode integrates with popular smart home ecosystems for voice control.
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Assistant Compatibility on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud Profile Storage
Does it support cloud profile storage?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
Cloud Profile Storage
Cloud Profile Storage is not available for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ offers this feature. The Rode can store user profiles in the cloud, allowing access and synchronization across devices.
Saves mic settings to the cloud.
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Profile Storage on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Does it feature acoustic modeling?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation is not specified for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ includes this feature. The Rode can simulate different acoustic environments, which can be useful for sound design or virtual studio applications.
Simulates room acoustics or mic characteristics.
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No
0Votes
Shure VP83F
Yes
0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro+
vs
Dual Capsule Blending
Dual Capsule Blending is not available for the Shure VP83F, but the Rode VideoMic Pro+ offers this feature. The Rode can combine signals from multiple capsules for a richer or more customizable sound profile.
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending,
Shure VP83F ◉ is
worse than
Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Capsule Blending on Shure VP83F ◉
vs Rode VideoMic Pro+ ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
